News >> Browse Articles >> Controversial

News >> Browse Articles >> Federal

News >> Browse Articles >> Security and Technology

+2

CIA No Longer Allowed to Fake Executions

CIA No Longer Allowed to Fake Executions

The proposal spells out what the agency can't do — including fake executions

Associated Press

May 13, 2008

Seeking to referee a stalemate over how the CIA can interrogate prisoners, a top Senate Republican says Congress should ban waterboarding and seven other abusive methods of interrogation but allow the spy agency some leeway in how it questions detainees.

Missouri Sen. Kit Bond, the senior Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee, outlined his proposal in nonbinding language accompanying a bill that sets out the intelligence community’s policies, programs and spending for 2009. An unclassified summary was released Thursday.

Like the 2008 version of the authorization bill — which President Bush vetoed — the 2009 bill restricts the CIA to using only the 19 interrogation techniques approved by the military in the Army Field Manual. Bond said he would seek to attach his proposed compromise to this or other legislation.

Cia2_max200w

waterboarding might still be legal – unfortunately?

Rather than prescribe what the intelligence agency may do in an interrogation, Bond wants to write into law only what the CIA cannot do: force detainees to be naked, perform sexual acts or pose in a sexual manner; have hoods or sacks placed over their heads or duct tape over their eyes; be beaten, shocked or burned; threatened with military dogs; exposed to extreme heat or cold; subjected to mock executions; deprived of food, water or medical care, or be waterboarded.

Waterboarding…Might Remain Legal?

Waterboarding involves strapping down a prisoner, covering his mouth with plastic or cloth and pouring water over his face. The prisoner quickly begins to inhale water, causing the sensation of drowning. CIA Director Michael Hayden acknowledged this spring that three CIA prisoners were waterboarded in 2002 and 2003. He prohibited the practice by the CIA in 2006, but it still could be used if authorized by the president and the attorney general.

Hayden has opposed the field manual limitation, saying the military list does not include all interrogation techniques that are consistent with U.S. law and the Geneva Conventions, such as sleep deprivation.

The unclassified portion of the new legislation focuses heavily on the CIA’s treatment and interrogation of detainees. It prohibits private contractors from participating in interrogations; it requires Red Cross access to all prisoners — an attempt to prevent the holding of secret or “ghost” detainees, and it requires an annual report on compliance with a law banning cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of prisoners.

It also requires the administration to turn over to Congress any legal justifications that address detainees. Last month, the Pentagon declassified an 81-page legal opinion from 2003 that outlined the legal basis for military interrogators to use harsh tactics against al-Qaida and Taliban detainees overseas, as long as they did not specifically intend to torture their captives. The memo also said the president’s wartime power as commander in chief would not be limited by the U.N. treaties against torture.


+2
  • Bald-eagle-head_max50

    Kyle

    2 months ago

    63 comments

    I think what SFox said is spot on. If violent interrogations are not effective, then they are not effective. Our efforts could be better spent elsewhere.
  • Photo_user_blank_big

    VICMOE

    2 months ago

    1 comment

    THIS COUNTRY IS TO GOOD TO TERRORISTS . THEY JUDGE , THEY BECOME JURORS AND THEY EXECUTE YOU, ALL THREE IN THREE SECONDS OR LESS. THE PRIZE IF THEY GET CAUGHT: LIFE IN PRISON WITH THREE GREAT MEALS A DAY , A COLOR T.V. WITH CABLE , PROBALLY A WOMAN FOR THEIR SEXUAL NEEDS AND A SCUM OF THE EARTH LAWYER FROM AMNESTY INT'L. COMMENT BY VICTOR M. FREYTAS .. VIKTOR FANTASTIC5@YAHOO.COM
  • Photo_user_blank_big

    Jmr_holguin

    2 months ago

    1 comment

    Ask yourself one question. Why everytime the CIA does something the congress is on there a**, when a terrorist gets one of ours do they said ummm i most follow instruction on how to interrogate this prisoner, no!! they either get information or kill you simple as that. so i think and say as everyone in here do what it takes to keep this nation safe!!!.
  • Photo_user_blank_big

    zalo

    2 months ago

    1 comment

    look at it this way fight fire with fire so if no liments is what it takes than thatis what should be done, and also think about the rich fat congress people who have had it easy they dont care because they have people to protect them. ther only saying that to get votes for the next election.
  • Photo_user_blank_big

    Snarl4u

    2 months ago

    1 comment

    darknessdiver is an IGNORANUS. Translation: An individual who is not only stupid, but an a**hole as well.
  • Photo_user_blank_big

    SFox

    2 months ago

    1 comment

    The problem with torture is that it is not effective. People will say anything under torture, whether it's true or not. Lots of studies have shown this -- that the quality of information received through torture is very very low. People getting waterboarded, shocked or deprived of sleep will ultimately say whatever they think their captors want them to say. If your desire is to punish enemies of the state and other bad guys, torture is the way to go, though there are other legal avenues to take that don't sully the reputation of the US or force individuals to take the law into their own hands. If you want to get information that will save US lives, better intelligence, surveillance, and infiltration is the answer.
  • Bald-eagle-head_max50

    Kyle

    2 months ago

    63 comments

    Which do you think is worse for prisoners - Waterboarding, or taking part in a fake execution? I think I would initially be more afraid of the fake execution, but waterboarding is worse altogether.
  • Photo_user_blank_big

    Joe_Bev

    2 months ago

    1 comment

    Is this guy NUTS? Or is he working for to get us all killed? I say, DO WHAT EVER IT TAKES TO GET THE INFORMATION THAT WILL SAVE ONE AMERICIAN AND ITS ALL WORTH IT! This guy is pitiful and a danger to the well being of the USA. People like him are bad for Americia. Does he think for one second that anyone else in the world would be nice in an interrogation? GET A CLUE! Dont tell people who are putting thier lives on the line everyday how to do thier jobs so we can all be safe!
  • Photo_user_blank_big

    darknessdiver

    2 months ago

    1 comment

    We all know the truth, but the democrats are terrorists to, and they are just protecting their own. the more things the crazy arabs blow up and the more the good respectful republicans defend their country as patriots and defend their families and family values. the democrats then have something to whine about. You ever notice, the republicans have beliefs, and the democrats have criticism? But the democrats care more about human rights than human life. We see it in abortion, and now in war. and the politician named in the article above, is not a republican, he is a democrat who is confused. You aren't a republican if you don't do or believe as a republican does.
  • Photo_user_blank_big

    RANGER36

    2 months ago

    1 comment

    IT'S BULL THAT THE CIA HAS TO BE TOLD WHAT THEY CAN AND CAN'T DO . THE TERRORIST AND CRIMINALS HAVE MORE RIGHTS THAN THE INNOCENCE . THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO WHAT EVER IT TAKES TO OBTAIN THE INTEL TO SAVE LIVES- DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT THE ENEMY HAS CERTAIN PROCEDURES THAT THEY HAVE TO FOLLOW - NO I DON'T THINK SO.

What's the Scoop?

Post a link to something interesting from another site, or submit your own original writing for the GovCentral community to read.

Submit A Story

Site Recent Activity

Photo_user_blank_big
sheba123 received the Quiz result of "Not too shabby.", 4 minutes ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
CaptDon5021 received the Quiz result of "Homeland Security Candidate", 8 minutes ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
cmscoop1 rated the employer "none" 4.2 stars, 13 minutes ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
CaptDon5021 received the Quiz result of "You are an expert!", 17 minutes ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
ystephens received the Quiz result of "Not too shabby.", 23 minutes ago.