Schwarzenegger Terminates Text-and-Drive
Texting on the road - it won't "be back"
Jason Mick | DailyTech
September 29, 2008
Everyone knows that text messaging while driving can be dangerously distracting. A recent study revealed that texting is more dangerous to driving than drugs or alcohol. Still many are fighting proposed legislation to ban texting while driving, complaining that it violates freedom and would limit options in an emergency.
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has taken a hard stance on texting while driving. He championed and passed a ban on cell phone texting, which will go into effect January 1. Offending motorists will pay $20 on their first violation, and $50 for each subsequent violation. Gov. Schwarzenegger was pleased to push through the bill by California’s Tuesday legislative deadline.
He hopes that the new bill will help dissuade drivers from using their cell phones when driving. He states, “Banning electronic text messaging while driving will keep drivers’ hands on the wheel and their eyes on the road, making our roadways a safer place for all Californians.”
Also read: Texting While Driving More Dangerous Than Drugs and Alcohol
Following the September 12 collision between a Metrolink passenger train and a freight train, which killed 25 people and injured 135, and was possibly caused by railroad engineer texting, the California Public Utilities Commission has banned some railroad workers from texting on the job.
California also passed a ban on holding cell phones while driving, which took effect July 1. The law only allows drivers to use hands-free headsets while driving. Insurers, bicyclists and, interestingly, cell phone companies supported both bills.
Sen. Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto), who wrote the new law, SB 28, and worked closely with Schwarzenegger states, “When somebody’s distracted it puts not just the driver at risk but everybody else in the car and everybody else on the highway.”
For those who think Gov. Schwarzenegger and California’s traffic agency are joking about the ban, they might want to consider the figures on the recent ban on holding cell phones. According to Tom Marshall, a spokesman for the California Highway Patrol, California state officers issued 19,753 citations to motorists. This is in addition to the thousands more issued by local police departments. While less drivers are stopped for the offense then speeding, the numbers add up Marshall said. He states, “Why everybody isn’t hands-free now, I have no idea.”
Many states are considering similar laws, or already have such laws in place. However, with the bipartisan leadership of the nation’s most populous state taking a high-profile stand against text-and-drive, the new legislation may spread throughout the nation.

SamEureka
about 1 month ago
4 comments
The fine in California for holding your phone while driving is $100 for the first offense. Assuming that all 19,753 were first offense California just made $1,975,300 minus court and enforcement costs that are most likely recouped by other means. Not a whole lot of money by California standards... but not chump change by any measure. I'm not suprised that wireless carriers would support the holding and texting bills. Dead talkers/texters don't pay subscription fees.
I live in Virginia (Calif. Native) and I see a lot of people on the road texting... I usually notice them because they are veering into my lane! I wouldn't mind seeing similar legislation here in the Commonwealth.
neal3189
about 1 month ago
98 comments
I agree with Scoobydoo on this one I really don't think it involves just your eyes on your road, but your full undivided attention. I think even the hands free devices can be distracting and have witnessed quite a few accidents in Florida even involving these devices. I tried to text just one time and realized I should never do it again. I almost went off the road. Scared the mess out of me so I learned my lesson. I do have to ask what Arnold is thinking though with just a $20 fine will people really learn their lesson. In the land of California I would think the fine is nothing!
peacebe
about 1 month ago
330 comments
Interesting article -- why just $20? Even using the cell phone -- hands on -- are just as important. Granted, there are roads and highways where people can't pull over and talk or text, but that's no excuse to take your eyes off the road.
ScoobyDoo
about 1 month ago
1216 comments
I guess people think that they are that important.
hwillny
about 1 month ago
640 comments
Yes, we have the same problem here in the D.C. area and it's very dangerous. I was rear ended a couple of months while stopped in traffic due to a guy talking on the phone while driving.
ScoobyDoo
about 1 month ago
1216 comments
But there is a falicy with the hands free devices. It's not whether your hands are on the wheel or not, but if your attention is on the road or not. Using a phone, hands free or not, requires attention, which takes it away from the road. How many of us drive one handed at one time or another, but our attention is still where it needs to be. The question is not the hands, but the mind.
amf85
about 1 month ago
1612 comments
About time. Texting while driving is incredibly dangerous, and flat out retarded. If you need to use your cell phone in the car...USE YOUR MOUTH. At least then you can keep your eyes on the road.
bluefly44
about 1 month ago
578 comments
I deal with dangerous drivers veering into other lanes on a daily basis, and every time I pass by, the drivers are either talking or texting on their cells, with no clue about what's going on around them. It's more than annoying, it's dangerous!